Showing posts with label ATT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ATT. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

Dell Settles Suit with NPE



Case Filed: Dec 02, 2011

Case Closed: Jun 12, 2013

Judge: Leonard Davis

Other Defendants: Mobile, Casio America, Google, Leap Wireless International, LG, MetroPCS Communications, Palm, Radioshack Corporation, Sony, Sprint Nextel Corporation, Sprint Solutions,  T-Mobile USA, United States Cellular Corporation, Verizon Communications, Virgin Mobile USA, ZTE, Kyocera Communications, HTC, Motorola Mobility, Huawei Technologies, Pantech Wireless, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Cellco Partnership (DBA Verizon Wireless) and STX Wireless Operations

Court: Texas Eastern District Court

Case Summary:
Garnet Digital sued AT&T, Apple, Dell, Samsung, RIM and several other defendants for patent infringement and included a claim for indirect infringement. Garnet Digital accused all of the defendants of infringing patent US5379421, which is entitled Interactive Terminal for the Access of Remote Database Information. The patent was issued on Jan 03, 1995 and expired[i] on Jan 03, 2012. The patent was last assigned[ii] to Garnet Digital (source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database). 

The allegations made against each of the defendants are as follows: "[Defendant] directly or through intermediaries, made, had made, used, imported, provided, supplied, distributed, sold, and/or offered for sale products and/or systems (including at least [Defendant's product(s)]) that infringed one or more claims of the ‘421 patent, and/or induced infringement and/or contributed to the infringement of one or more of the claims of the 421 patent by its customers." The accused products were iPhones, Samsung smartphones, Dell Venue smartphones, and BlackBerry smartphones, etc. 

The case was ongoing and the defendants consecutively were dismissed from the case on filing joint motion to dismiss. The last one to settle the case was Dell, where the parties reached agreement and filed for dismissal on Jun 10. Upon consideration, the Court ordered all claims and counter claims be dismissed and each party to bear their own costs and expenses. 

See 6:11-cv-00647 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.

Patent Term Estimator, use our free tool or download our free Android app on Google Play Store.



[i] Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents.
[ii] MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Texas Court Dismisses Lawsuit against HTC



Case Filed: Mar 12, 2012

Case Closed: May 10, 2013

Judge: Barbara M.G. Lynn

Court: Texas Northern District Court

Case Summary:
MES accused HTC, AT&T, Sprint, Verizon and Celco of infringing 4 patents related to the transmission of data to and from mobile phones. The patents involved in this suit are:

  • US6415325 - Transmission system with improved synchronization, issued on July 02, 2002 and expires* by Dec 16, 2017
  • US6879838 - Distributed location based service system, issued on Apr 12, 2005 and expires* by Apr 20, 2021
  • US7096033 - Mobile apparatus enabling inter-network communication, issued on Aug 22, 2006 and expires* by Jul 18, 2020 
  • US7317687 - Transmitting data frames with less interframe space (ifs) time, issued on Jan 08, 2008 and expires* by Jul 13, 2024
The patents are currently assigned[i] to MES (source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database). MES alleged that defendants are manufacturing and commercializing HTC devices including HTC Inspire, HTC Status and HTC Vivid that are configurable to communicate data received from a first communication network to a second communication network as claimed in the above said patents. 

The dispute has reached an end with MES filing motion to dismiss all the claims. Upon MES’s request, the Court ordered all the claims and counterclaims be dismissed without prejudice, thereby concluding the case. However, another case filed by MES against Motorola Mobility asserting the same patents is still pending.
See 3:12-cv-00794 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.

Has this patent been litigated? Use our free tool or download our free Android/iOS app on Google Play/ App Store.



* Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents.

[i] MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.

Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Data Carriers and Samsung et al. reach Settlement

Data Carriers, a non-practicing company that a holds number of technology patents, had filed lawsuits against Samsung, Barnes & Noble, HTC and AT&T in Mar, 2013 in the District Court of Delaware, which have now come to a close. The suits were filed for infringement of US patent number 5388198 entitled ‘Proactive presentation of automating features to a computer user’. The patent was issued on Feb 07 1995 and expired[i] on Apr 16, 2012. The patent is currently assigned[ii] to Data Carriers and was previously owned by Symantec (Source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database). 

The complaint stated that the defendants make use of the autocomplete features (technology claimed ‘198 patent) in their website, smartphones, tablets, notebooks, Chromebooks, media players, and tablet computers.

It appears that the parties have settled the cases and reached an agreement. Upon their requests for dismissal, the Court ordered Dismissal With Prejudice of all claims by Plaintiff Data Carriers and Dismissal Without Prejudice of all counterclaims by Defendants Samsung, Barnes & Noble, HTC and AT&T.

To know more about the cases, please see 1:12-cv-00933, 1:12-cv-00330, 1:12-cv-00346 and 1:12-cv-00335.

If you are interested in knowing more about the cases filed and closed on the previous day, please contact us. To get alerts on cases filed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.

Has this patent been litigated? Use our free tool or download our free Android app on Google Play.


[i] Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents.
[ii] MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Lawsuit Summary - SmartPhone vs. Apple and AT&T



Plaintiff: SmartPhone Technologies LLC

Defendant: Apple Inc., AT&T Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC

A case (6:13-cv-00196) was filed in the Eastern District of Texas on Feb 25th for patent infringement. The patents involved in this suit are US7076275 (Method and system for single-step enablement of telephony functionality for a portable computer system), US7506064 (Handheld computer system that attempts to establish an alternative network link upon failing to establish a requested network link), RE40459 (Method and apparatus for communicating information over low bandwidth communications networks) and US7533342 (System and method of a personal computer device providing telephone capability). All these patents are currently assigned[*] to Access Co. Ltd. (source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database). SmartPhone is the exclusive licensee of the 4 patents as per the complaint. 

The ‘275, ‘064 and ‘342 patents relate to the field of portable electronic devices such as personal digital assistants or palmtop computer systems. They allow a background task to run on a portable electronic device facilitating telephony functionality. The ‘459 patent relates to the field of information communications and to low bandwidth network access to internet based information.

Complaint alleges that Apple is manufacturing and marketing computerized communication devices including iPhone4S, iPad2, iPad3, iPad4 and iPad mini, which infringe the methods claimed in the patents-in-suit. 

Another case (6:13-cv-00197) was filed on the same day against LG Electronics asserting the patent US7076275. If you are interested in knowing more about the cases filed, please contact us. To get alerts on cases filed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts. 

Has this patent been litigated? Use our free tool or download our free Android app on Google Play.



[*] MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.