Showing posts with label LG. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LG. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 6, 2014

Celgard Receives Favorable Ruling on Preliminary Injunction against LG

Case Filed: Aug 01, 2014

Origin Case: 3:14-cv-00043

Case Summary:

Charlotte, North Carolina-based company, Celgard, LLC, a subsidiary of Polypore International, Inc., a filtration company specializing in microporous membranes filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court of North Carolina against LG Chem, Ltd. and LG Chem America, Inc. (LG) in Jan 2014. The suit concerned LG’s infringement on a U.S patent that in general relates to “separators” used in the construction of high energy rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. The district court issued sales ban on LG’s infringing product which LG has appealed.  

Patents-in-Suit:
The patent at issue is: US6432586 entitled ‘Separator for a high energy rechargeable lithium battery,’ issued on Aug 13, 2002 and expiring[i] by Apr 10, 2020. Celgard is the current assignee[ii] of the ‘586 patent (source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database).

As in Complaint:
The complaint alleged that LG has infringed Celgard's patent by manufacturing, making, using, selling, offering for sale and/or importing lithium-ion battery separators and batteries that fall within the scope of the ‘586 patent. According to Celgard, the lawsuit has been filed following a lengthy period of unsuccessful discussions with LG regarding various business terms of its relationship with Celgard, including infringement of the ‘586 patent.

The complaint said that the defendants have sold and shipped batteries containing infringing battery separators to consumer electronics, laptop, battery pack and/or electric device manufacturers and/or distributors in the United States.

LG’s infringement of the ‘586 patent has been willful and deliberate and thus are entitled to increased damages and attorneys’ fees and costs, according to the complaint.

District Court Order:
LG filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal Jurisdiction and motion to transfer venue. Celgard filed a motion for preliminary injunction and motion for jurisdictional discovery. The court heard oral arguments on these motions in May 2014.

Having considered the motions, the court granted plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction. It was also ordered that defendants are preliminarily enjoined from manufacturing and commercializing any battery, separator, or system that uses or constitutes (i) LG Chem’s SRS technology, (ii) an infringing ceramic-coated separator, or (iii) any rechargeable lithium-ion battery, cell, pack, module, or other device, vehicle, or product that includes an infringing ceramic-coated separator.

Appeal Court:
LG has now moved for appeal against district court’s order banning LG’s infringing products.

See 2014-1675 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.
Max-Insight enables you to access all of our patent tools such as Patent Term Estimator, Patent Family Tree, Has This Patent Been Litigated, etc. in one location. Max-Insight is available in 4 different subscriptions: FreeBronzeSilver and Gold with varying usage levels. To learn more about Max-Insight, click here.





[i] Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents. 
[ii] MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.

Tuesday, July 8, 2014

Toshiba, Vizio Win Lochner Computer Patent Suit; Appeal Court Remands

Case Filed: Aug 07, 2013
Case Closed: Jun 27, 2014
Origin Case: 8:12-cv-01659
Case Summary:
Texas-based non-practicing entity, Lochner Technologies sued many internet and technology firms including Apple, Cisco, Samsung, Google, Nokia, Vizio, and others over an U.S. patent involving a technique for interconnecting multiple computers, which remain at fixed locations. Other defendants named in the suit were: RIM, Acer, Motorola, HTC, LG, Sony, Panasonic, Roku, NEC, ASUS, Toshiba, Casio, ViewSonic, Unisys and Amazon. The suit was filed in Oct 2012 in California Central District Court.
Patent-in-Suit:
The suit revolved around the patent: US7035598 entitled ‘Modular computer system,’ issued by USPTO to inventors: Scott Lochner and Meir Bartur on Apr 25, 2006 and expired[i] on Sep 13, 2013. Lochner was the last assignee[ii] of the patent (source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database). The ‘598 patent relates to computers and is aimed at providing freedom of movement for a user in operating a computing device in a network and enhancing the possibilities of sharing a single computer system by multiple users.
As in Complaint:
Lochner alleged that defendants infringed the ’598 patent by designing products such as smartphones and tablet computers that wirelessly play streaming video from servers. Some of the products cited were: iPhone, Cius, PlayBooks, Iconia, Galaxy, Droid Bionic, WildFire S, Flyer, Revolution, Nexus, Xperia, Toughbook, Tablet S and P, Eee Slates, Thrives, G’zOne Commando, ViewPads, etc.
Plaintiff requested judgment in favor declaring that each defendant has willfully infringed resulting in enhanced damages and a jury trial.
District Court Proceedings:
In 2011, Unisys was terminated from the case due to voluntary dismissal filed by Lochner. In the following year, claims against Cisco, RIM, Acer, Samsung, Motorola, HTC, LG, Google, Nokia, Sony, Panasonic, Sony, Roku, ASUS, ViewSonic, Amazon and NEC were dismissed with prejudice. In 2013, a joint motion to dismiss Apple and Casio was filed resulting in dismissal of the parties with prejudice.
Vizio and Toshiba filed counterclaims seeking a declaration that the ’598 patent is not infringed and invalid. In Jul 2013, after considering evidence, arguments and all other matters, court entered judgment in favor of defendants, granting motion for summary judgment of invalidity of ‘598 patent. The court ordered:
  • asserted claims of the ’598 patent are invalid for lack of adequate written description and failure to claim what the applicant regards as his invention
  • counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice
  • defendants are entitled to recover costs incurred.
Appeal Court:
In Aug 2013, Lochner appealed district court’s final judgment favoring Vizio and Toshiba. Appeal court concluded that the district court erred in its claim construction analysis of the term “input-output system.” Appeal court vacated district court’s decision on finding the asserted claims as invalid and remanded for further proceedings consistent with new claim construction.
Other Cases:
Lochner has filed nearly a dozen cases since 2009 against Dell, Barnes & Noble, AT Labs etc. asserting the same patent.
See 2013-1551 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.
Max-Insight enables you to access all of our patent tools such as Patent Term Estimator, Patent Family Tree, Has This Patent Been Litigated, etc. in one location. Max-Insight is available in 4 different subscriptions: FreeBronzeSilver and Gold with varying usage levels. To learn more about Max-Insight, click here.




[i] Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents.
[ii] MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

LG Settles Litigation against Touchscreen’s Gesture Patents

Case Filed: Jul 25, 2013

Case Closed: Dec 13, 2013

Court: California Northern District Court

Judge: William Alsup

Case Summary:

A patent infringement case was filed by Touchscreen Gestures against LG claiming that the latter have violated four patents related to providing functionality through a host of smartphone gestures including dragging, tapping on a display and scrolling. The patents involved are:
  •       US7180506 - Method for identifying a movement of single tap on a touch device, issued on Feb 20, 2007
  •        US7184031 - Method and controller for identifying a drag gesture, issued on Feb 27, 2007
  •        US7190356 - Method and controller for identifying double tap gestures, issued on Mar 13, 2007
  •      US7319457 - Method of scrolling window screen by means of controlling electronic device, issued on Jan 15, 2008

The ‘506, ‘356 and ‘457 patents expire[i] on Feb 12, 2024 and the ‘031 patent expires on Jul 06, 2024. These patents are currently assigned[ii] to Touchscreen Gestures (source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database). The patents were originally issued to Sentelic Corporation, a Taiwan based company, manufacturing products including touch screens, touch pads, and touch buttons for applications in electronic devices. The complaint stated that the patents are ‘directed to novel, unique and non-obvious methods’.
Touchscreen Gestures accused a bunch of LG products such as LG Genesis, Elite, Ignite, myTouch, Vortex smartphones as well as the LG Optimus and G-Slate tablets, which allow the identification of drag, tap and scroll gestures via methods, controllers and gestures units as infringing claims of the ‘031, ‘506, ‘356 and ‘457 patents.

Initially, the case revolved around 4 patents and later an amended complaint was filed asserting the '031, '506 and '356 patents, thus dismissing its assertion the '457 patent. The case was then transferred from Eastern District of Texas to Northern District of California. Later, the parties agreed to resolve the dispute after which LG filed a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice, thereby ending the litigation.

See 3:13-cv-03442 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.

Patent Term Estimator, use our free tool or download our free Android app on Google Play Store. 





[i] Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents.
[ii] MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.

Thursday, December 12, 2013

LG, Cellport End Patent Litigation

Case Filed: Jan 24, 2013

Case Closed: Dec 09, 2013

Court: Colorado District Court

Judge: R. Brooke Jackson

Case Summary:
Cellport filed a complaint against LG for violating their patents relating to mobile communications. The patent involved in this suit is: US6122514 entitled ‘Communications channel selection’, issued on Sep 19, 2000 and expiring[*] by Jan 03, 2017. CellPort is the current assignee[†] of the patent (Source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database). CellPort develops and licenses wireless communication architectures and connectivity solutions that connect wireless phones to home, office, hand-held and automotive environments worldwide.

The patent in suit relates to communicating data over one or more selected network channels, particularly where such a communication involves a mobile unit. The complaint alleged that the defendant infringes the patent by using a method of sending videos and/or pictures in conjunction with the data connection and/or file transmission management features in the accused products, which directly infringes the ‘514 patent. Cellport said LG have had actual knowledge of the ‘514 patent and willfully ignored the patent.

The suit cites LG Optimus 3D, LG Thrill 4G (at least the P-925 model) and other cell phones as the infringing products.

The case is now concluded as the parties agreed to settle the dispute. On Dec 06, Cellport filed stipulation of dismissal pursuant to which the Court ordered all the claims and counterclaims in this action dismissed with prejudice with each party bearing its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

See 1:13-cv-00175 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.

* Expected expiration date using Patent Term Estimator, use our free tool or download our free Android app on Google Play Store.




[*] Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator  is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents.
[†] MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.

Monday, November 18, 2013

Wi-Lan, LG Case Administratively Closed

Case Filed: Aug 14, 2013

Case Closed: Nov 08, 2013

Court: New Jersey District Court

Judge: Dennis M. Cavanaugh

Case Duration: 86 Days

A patent infringement case was filed by Wi-Lan, a Canadian based patent licensing company against LG, electronics product manufacturer for violating 2 of their computer display system patents. The patents involved in the suit were:
  •     US6359654 entitled Methods and systems for displaying interlaced video on non-interlaced monitors, issued on Mar 19, 2002 and expiring[i]`by Feb 12, 2017
  •         US7034889 entitled Signal processing unit and method for a digital TV system with an increased frame rate video signal, issued on Apr 25, 2006 and expiring[ii]`by Jan 05, 2019
The ‘654 patent is currently assigned[iii] to Conexant Systems and ‘889 patent to Wi-Lan (source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database).  As per the complaint, ‘654 patent is assigned/owned by Wi-Lan.

The ‘654 invention relates to methods and systems for displaying interlaced video on monitors which are non-interlaced and the ‘889 patent relates to a signal processing unit for a digital TV system. The complaint said, LG manufactures products including 6200 series of flat panel televisions that infringe the claims of the ‘654 and ‘889 patents.

It appears that the parties agreed and submitted a joint status letter on Oct 25, 2013, that all discovery and scheduling in the case should be stayed. Upon consideration, the Court granted stay and ordered the case to be administratively closed pending the result of New York Court’s decision on whether to compel arbitration.

See 2:13-cv-04895 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.
* Expected expiration date using Patent Term Estimator, use our free tool or download our free Android app on Google Play Store. 




[i] Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents

[iii] MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.

Thursday, October 24, 2013

LG, Canatelo End IP Suit over Security Camera

Case Filed: Feb 20, 2013

Case Closed: Oct 16, 2013

Court: Puerto Rico District Court

Judge: Aida M. Delgado-Colon

Case Summary:
Canatelo sued LG asserting the claims covered in the US patents 7310111 and 6476858, both entitled ‘Video monitoring and security system’ were infringed. The patents were issued on Nov 05, 2002 and Dec 18, 2007 and expire[i] by Aug 12, 2019. Canatelo is the current assignee[ii] of the patents (source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database).

The '111 patent covers a process in which a video camera detects motion, and then turns the video signal frames into JPEG photo format once motion is detected. The '858 patent claims the use of a computer inside a video camera to send out a notification email with the captured image(s). The complaint stated that the infringing product, LSW2010N/LSW2010P IP Box Camera performs a method of operating a video surveillance system as claimed in the above patents. Canatelo requested Court to order judgment in favor, permanent enjoinment from further infringement and money damages.

Canatelo subsequently filed a motion to dismiss the case on Oct 11th, pursuant to which the Court rendered its final verdict on Oct 16th, ordering dismissal with prejudice and without imposition of costs and attorneys’ fees on the parties.

Suits were also filed against other video surveillance manufacturers Panasonic, Pelco, Bosch, Samsung and Logitech asserting the same patents, which are pending.

See 3:13-cv-01149and 2:13-cv-00043 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.

Are you looking for a tool to calculate patent terms? Try Patent Term Estimator, our free tool or download our free Android app on Google Play Store. 





[i] Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents.
[ii] MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.

Wednesday, August 7, 2013

Court Grants Motion for Summary Judgment in Favor of LG



Case Filed: Nov 08, 2012

Case Closed: Aug 01, 2013

Court: California Southern District Court

Judge: Marilyn L. Huff

Case Summary:
Plaintiff, Multimedia Patent Trust filed a complaint for patent infringement against LG, the defendant, accusing infringement of two patents pertaining to video compression technology that allows data to be sent more efficiently over communication media. The patents-in-suit were:
  • US5136377 entitled Adaptive non-linear quantizer, issued on Aug 04, 1992 and expired* on Dec 11, 2010
  • US5227878 entitled Adaptive coding and decoding of frames and fields of video, issued on Jul 13, 1993 and expired* on Nov 15, 2011
The patents were originally assigned to AT&T and last assigned+ to Multimedia Patent Trust (source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database). MTP claimed its patents were infringed by products such as LG260, RumorLX260, Rhythm AX565, Scoop AX260, EnVTouch VX11000, Tritan AX840, Phoenix P505, Thrive P506, Genesis US760 and few others. The complaint said MTP notified LG of its infringement it refused to take license. MTP asked Court judgment in favor and money damages. 

On Jun 19, 2013, LG filed a motion for summary judgment and in mid July, Court held a hearing and upon considering LG’s motion, granted summary judgment in favor of LG. Further details of the verdict were not disclosed.
  
MPT has previously litigated against Microsoft, Gateway, Dell, Acer and few others.
See 3:12-cv-02731 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.

Are you looking for a tool to calculate patent terms? Try Patent Term Estimator, our free tool or download our free Android app on Google Play Store.   



* Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents.
*
+ MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.

Thursday, June 20, 2013

Texas Court Dismisses Suit against LG, AT&T



Case Filed: Feb 25, 2013

Case Closed: Jun 12, 2013

Court: Texas Eastern District Court

Judge: Leonard Davis

Case Summary:
A patent infringement case was filed by SmartPhone Technologies against LG and AT&T asserting that their patents were infringed. The patents involved in this suit were:

·        US7076275 entitled Method and system for single-step enablement of telephony functionality for a portable computer system, issued on Jul 11, 2006 and expiring* by Oct 13, 2020
·        USRE40459 entitled Method and apparatus for communicating information over low bandwidth communications networks, issued on Aug 12, 2008 and expiring* by May 29, 2018

The ‘275 and ‘459 patents are currently assigned+ to Access (source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database) and SmartPhone is the exclusive licensee of the patents. 

The complaint alleged that defendants manufacture computerized communications devices including, Android smartphones and tablets that infringe the method claimed in the patents. Plaintiff sought a judgment in favor and all other relief to which the Court may deem the plaintiff be entitled.

However, recently the parties filed joint motion to dismiss, following which the Court rendered its final judgment on Jun 12, ordering the claims and counterclaims be dismissed and each party to bear the costs and expenses incurred.

See 6:13-cv-00197 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.
Patent Term Estimator, use our free tool or download our free Android app on Google Play Store.


* Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents.
*
+ MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.