Showing posts with label Novartis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Novartis. Show all posts

Friday, August 8, 2014

Novartis Wins Ruling Against Watson over Exelon Generics

Case Filed: Nov 09, 2011

Case Closed: Aug 04, 2014

Court: Delaware District Court

Judge: Richard G. Andrews

Case Summary:
Novartis filed a patent infringement suit against Watson over the generic-drug maker's plans to manufacture a generic version of Exelon® Patch, a treatment of mild to moderate dementia of the Alzheimer’s type and Parkinson’s disease. The other defendant named in the suit was LTS Lohmann Therapie-Systeme AG. The judge signed off the final judgment favoring Novartis delaying FDA approval of the generic versions.

Patents-in-Suit:
The patents involved in the suit were:

  •        US5602176 entitled ‘Phenyl carbamate,’ issued on Feb 11, 1997 and expired* on Feb 11, 2014
  •     US6316023 entitled ‘TTS containing an antioxidant,’ issued on Jan 01, 2002 and expiring* by Apr 14, 2019
  •     US6335031 entitled ‘TTS containing an antioxidant,’ issued on Nov 13, 2001 and expiring* by Jan 08, 2019
The ’023 and ‘031 patents claim pharmaceutical compositions of the drug and the ‘176 patent also claims methods of treating conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease.

The ’176 patent was initially assigned to Sandoz, which subsequently became Novartis AG after the merger. The ’023 and ’031 patents are currently assigned± to Novartis AG and LTS (source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database).

As in Complaint:
Novartis alleged that Watson committed an act of infringement by filing ANDA no. 202119 for obtaining approval to engage in the commercial manufacture, use, or sale of Watson’s ANDA Products before the expiration of the ’176, ’023, and ’031 patents. According to the complaint, Watson asserted that the ’176, ’023, and ’031 patents are invalid, unenforceable and/or will not be infringed.

NDA Holder:
Novartis currently holds· an approved new drug application (NDA) no. 22-083 for Exelon® Patch (rivastigmine transdermal system or extended release film) (4.6 mg and 9.5 mg/24 hr dosages), which contains the active ingredient rivastigmine (source: Patent Marker). Exelon® Patch was approved by FDA in Jul 2007 and is indicated for the treatment of mild to moderate dementia of the Alzheimer’s type and Parkinson’s disease.

District Court Judgment:
The court entered final judgment favoring plaintiff and against Watson, finding that the rivastigmine transdermal products, subject to Watson's ANDA infringe claims 3, 7, 13, 16 and 18 of the '031 patent and claims 2 and 7 of the '023 patent. The judge also stated that those claims are valid and not obvious. The effective date of any final approval by FDA of Watson's ANDA should not be earlier than expiration date of the '031 and '023 patents.

See 1:11-cv-01112 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.
Max-Insight enables you to access all of our patent tools such as Patent Term Estimator, Patent Family Tree, Has This Patent Been Litigated, etc. in one location. Max-Insight is available in 4 different subscriptions: FreeBronzeSilver and Gold with varying usage levels. To learn more about Max-Insight, click here. 



* Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents.

± MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.
· Patent Marker provides an online environment where patentees can virtually mark products and search products for patent-related information.

Monday, May 5, 2014

Actavis, Novartis Resolve Patent Dispute over Iron-Control Drug Patents

Case Filed: Mar 21, 2012

Case Closed: Apr 29, 2014

Court: Delaware District Court

Judge: Richard G. Andrews

Case Summary:

Novartis, based in Basel, Switzerland sued generic-drug maker Actavis of Zug, Switzerland, alleging infringement of two U.S. patents, which Novartis listed as covering the iron-control drug, Exjade. The lawsuit concerned Actavis filing  an ANDA seeking approval to market a generic version of Exjade, deferasirox in tablet form.

The patents at issue were: US6465504 and US6596750 both reading ‘Substituted 3, 5-diphenyl-1,2,4-triazoles and their use as pharmaceutical metal chelators’. The patents were issued on Oct 15, 2002 and July 22, 2003, respectively. The patents are set to expire[i] by Jun 25, 2016 and are currently assigned[ii] to Novartis (source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database).

The complaint alleged that Actavis Group acted collaboratively in the preparation and submission of ANDA No. 203560. By filing ANDA, Actavis has represented that its generics have the same active ingredient and are bioequivalent to Exjade®. In the notice letter, Actavis had told Novartis its patents “are invalid, unenforceable.”

Novartis is the current holder[iii] of New Drug Application (NDA) No. 21-882, which the FDA granted approval for marketing and sale of 125 mg, 250 mg and 500 mg strength deferasirox tablets, oral suspension (source: Patent Marker.) Novartis markets deferasirox tablets in the United States under the trade name Exjade®. It is used to treat patients with chronic anemia disorders who get blood transfusions that result in an excess of iron, which may cause damage to the heart, liver and other organs.

According to the complaint, the composition, formulation, dosing and method of administration for Exjade® are covered by certain claims of the ’504 and’750 patents.

Stipulation and order of dismissal was filed by Novartis in which it stated that both the parties stipulate and agree to dismiss all the claims and counterclaims, defenses, motions and petitions asserted in this action without prejudice and each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. Accordingly, Court granted the stipulation, thereby ending the dispute.

See 1:12-cv-00366 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.

Max-Insight enables you to access all of our patent tools such as Patent Term Estimator, Patent Family Tree, Has This Patent Been Litigated, etc. in one location. Max-Insight is available in 4 different subscriptions: FreeBronzeSilver and Gold with varying usage levels. To learn more about Max-Insight, click here.




[i] Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents.
[ii] MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.
[iii] Patent Marker provides an online environment where patentees can virtually mark products and search products for patent-related information.

Thursday, October 17, 2013

Novartis, Apotex Resolve Suit over Lotrel Patent

Case Filed: Sep 06, 2012

Case Closed: Oct 10, 2013

Court: New Jersey District Court

Judge: Jose L. Linares

Case Summary:
Apotex resolved a suit brought in by Novartis accusing the generic manufacturer for infringing its patent related to treating cardiovascular disease. Judge granted the stipulation filed by the parties and dismissed the case without prejudice, ending the litigation that alleged Apotex’s abbreviated new drug application for a generic version of Lotrel infringed the ‘802 patent covering the medication.

Novartis filed a complaint to protect its ‘802 patent after Apotex submitted an ANDA no. 91431 to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for amlodipine and benazepril hydrochloride combination capsules (generic version of Lotrel), in 2.5 mg/10 mg, 5 mg/10 mg, 5 mg/20 mg, 5 mg/40 mg, 10 mg/20 mg, and 10 mg/40 mg dosage strengths. With its suit, Novartis sought the court to declare a permanent enjoinment of Apotex from marketing and selling its generic version of Lotrel, as well as a court order that any approval of Apotex's ANDA would not be effective until after expiration of the ‘802 patent.

The patent in suit US6162802 entitled ‘Synergistic combination therapy using benazepril and amlodipine for the treatment of cardiovascular disorders and compositions therefor’, was legally issued to Joseph Papa and Marc M. J. Henis on Dec 19, 2000 and expires[i] by Dec 19, 2017. The patent is currently assigned[ii] to Novartis (source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database).

As pointed out in complaint, the ’802 patent is directed to compositions consisting of specified amounts of benazepril and amlodipine as well as a method of treating hypertension in humans, consisting of administering a daily dose of specified amounts of benazepril and amlodipine.

Novartis’s Lotrel is used to treat high blood pressure (hypertension). It works by relaxing blood vessels, causing them to widen. Lowering high blood pressure helps prevent strokes, heart attacks and kidney problems. Novartis currently holds[iii] the new drug application no. 020364 for amlodipine and benazepril hydrochloride combination capsules in various dosage strengths, which it sells under the brand name Lotrel® (source: MaxVal’s Patent Marker) and approved by FDA on Mar 3, 1995.

See case 2:12-cv-05574 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.

Are you looking for a tool to calculate patent terms? Try Patent Term Estimator, our free tool or download our free Android app on Google Play Store.



[i] Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents.
[ii] MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.
[iii] Patent Marker provides an online environment where patentees can virtually mark products and search products for patent-related information.

Friday, May 24, 2013

Celegen, Novartis, IntelliPharmaceutics Resolve ADHD Suit

Three patent disputes between pharma companies for filing abbreviated new drug application were resolved on Tuesday. One among them is the Celgene Corporation vs. Intellipharmaceutics. 

Case Filed: June 29, 2012

Case Closed: May 21, 2013

Judge: Susan D. Wigenton

Court: New Jersey District Court

Case Summary:

Celgene and Novartis filed a complaint against Intellipharmaceutics for filing (ANDA) no. 78-992 with the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) seeking approval to manufacture a generic version of Novartis’ Focalin XR® drug that allegedly infringes the patents:

Patent Number

Current Assignee[i]
Issued Date
Expiration Date[ii]
Title
Nov 17, 1998
Dec 04, 2015
Delivery of multiple doses
of medications

Oct 21, 2003

Dec 04, 2015
Delivery of multiple doses
of medications
Jun 01, 1999
Dec 04, 2015
Method of treating
attention deficit disorders with d-threo methylphenidate
Mar 12, 2002
Dec 04, 2015
Phenidate drug formulations
having diminished abuse potential
Mar 04, 2003
Dec 04, 2015
Phenidate drug formulations
having diminished abuse potential
Oct 07, 2008
Jun 10, 2023
Delivery of multiple doses
of medications

Novartis currently holds[iii] an FDA approved New Drug Application(NDA) no. 021802  for extended release capsules that are sold under thetrade name Focalin XR® (source: Maxval’s Patent Marker). It is used in the treatment of  Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) inpatients above 6 years.

The suit is now concluded. It appears that the parties have reached an agreement. Followed by the agreement, the court ordered a stay for 60 days in order to permit review of the settlements. It is also ordered that all claims, counterclaims to be dismissed without prejudice. The charges are imposed on any parties. The terms of the settlements were undisclosed.

See 2:12-cv-04039 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.

Has this patent been litigated? Use our free tool or download our free Android/iOS app on Google Play/ App Store.


[i] MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.
[ii] Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free  web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents.
[iii] Patent Marker provides an online environment where patentees can virtually mark products and search products for patent-related information.

Sunday, April 28, 2013

Sandoz and Shire Enter a Settlement Agreement



On April 27, 2011, a case was filed against Sandoz, a subsidiary of Novartis and generic drug maker for infringing the Shire Patents. 

Patent Number
Current Assignee[i]
Issue Date
Expiration Date
Title
US5854290
Dec 29, 1998
Dec 20, 2020
Use of guanfacine in the treatment of behavioral disorders
US6287599
Sep 11, 2001
Dec 20, 2021
Sustained release pharmaceutical dosage forms with minimized pH dependent dissolution profiles
US6811794
Nov 2, 2004
Sep 21, 2015
Sustained release pharmaceutical dosage forms with minimized pH dependent dissolution profiles
Source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database . Shire has the exclusive license to the above patents as stated in the complaint. 

These patents in general covers the FDA approved guanfacine hydrochloride extended release tablets, Eq. 1 mg Base, Eq. 2 mg Base, Eq. 3 mg Base and Eq. 4 mg Base, which is marketed by Shire under the name of Intuniv® and currently[ii] holds the NDA no. 022037 (source: Patent Marker). The suit was filed by Shire et al. against Sandoz for seeking FDA approval to market a generic version of Intuniv (Sandoz Product) (ANDA no. 202568). 

The case now turns out to be closed as the parties entered a Settlement Agreement under which Shire granted Sandoz the license to ‘Shire Patents’. Sandoz admitted that all the claims in the Shire Patents are valid and enforceable and the sale of Sandoz Product would constitute infringement of the Shire Patents in the absence of license. As the parties have agreed to terminate the pending litigation it is ordered that case is dismissed. 

Case Details
Court: Colorado District Court

Judge: Philip A. Brimmer

Other Defendants: Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Amy F.T. Arnsten, Pasko Rakic and Robert D. Hunt

Closed On: Apr 18, 2013

See case 1:11-cv-01110 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts

Has this patent been litigated? Use our free tool or download our free Android/iOS app on Google Play/ App Store.

[i] MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.
[ii] Patent Marker provides an online environment where patentees can virtually mark products and search products for patent-related information.