Showing posts with label Sandoz. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sandoz. Show all posts

Friday, June 6, 2014

Astrazeneca Sues Sandoz to Delay Generic Faslodex



Case Filed: Jun 03, 2014

Court: New Jersey District Court

Judge: Freda L. Wolfson

Case Summary:
Astrazeneca filed a patent infringement lawsuit concerning Sandoz’s filing of abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) seeking approval to engage in the commercial manufacture, use and sale of its fulvestrant injection, 250 mg/5 mL product, which is a generic version of AstraZeneca’s Faslodex® (fulvestrant injection) product, prior to the expiration of their four U.S. patents. 

Patents-in-Suit:
The patents involved in the suit are: US6774122, US7456160, US8329680 and US8466139 entitled ‘Formulation,’ issued on Aug 10, 2004, Nov 25, 2008, Dec 11, 2012 and Jun 18, 2013, respectively. All the patents are scheduled to expire[i] by Jan 10, 2020. Astrazeneca is the current assignee[ii] of the patents-in-suit (source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database.) The use of Faslodex® (fulvestrant injection) is covered by the claims of the ’122, ’160, ’680 and ’139 patents.

NDA Holder:
AstraZeneca is the current holder[iii] of approved new drug application (NDA) No. 21-344 for Faslodex® in 50 mg/mL dosage forms (source: Patent Marker). Faslodex® (fulvestrant injection) is an estrogen receptor antagonist approved by the FDA for the treatment of hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women with disease progression following antiestrogen therapy. 

As in Complaint:
Sandoz notified AstraZeneca that it submitted ANDA No. 205935 seeking approval from FDA and included that the ’122, ’160, ’680, and ’139 patents are invalid, unenforceable, and/or will not be infringed by the manufacture, use, importation, sale or offer for sale of Sandoz’s ANDA product. Astrazeneca claimed that Sandoz is knowingly and willfully infringing the patents-in-suit. 

According to AstraZeneca, no allegations were made that the claims of the ’122, ’160, ’680, and ’139 patents are not infringed by Sandoz’s ANDA Product.

The complaint further stated that the notice letter lacked any legal or factual basis for non-infringement of any claims of the patents-in-suit. 

AstraZeneca seeks unspecified damages, costs and expenses.

See 3:14-cv-03547 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.

Max-Insight enables you to access all of our patent tools such as Patent Term Estimator, Patent Family Tree, Has This Patent Been Litigated, etc. in one location. Max-Insight is available in 4 different subscriptions: FreeBronzeSilver and Gold with varying usage levels. To learn more about Max-Insight, click here.


[i] Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents.
[ii] MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.
[iii] Patent Marker provides an online environment where patentees can virtually mark products and search products for patent-related information.

Wednesday, March 5, 2014

B&L Files Lawsuit against Sandoz Alleging Patent Infringement

Case Filed: Mar 02, 2014

Court: New Jersey District Court

Judge: Michael A. Shipp

Case Summary:
Plaintiffs Bausch & Lomb, Mitsubishi Tanabe and Ube Industries jointly filed a complaint against generic drug maker Sandoz accusing the latter of infringing a patent owned by Mitsubishi Tanabe and Ube (as per the face page). Bausch & Lomb is the current holder[i] of approved New Drug Application (NDA) No. 022288, which covers Bepreve® (source: MaxVal Patent Marker). The lawsuit concerned the filing of an abbreviated new drug application with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution intended to be a generic version of Bepreve®.

Bepreve™ (bepotastine besilate) is a prescription eye drop used to treat eye allergies. Bepreve is manufactured by Bausch & Lomb and is currently under the protection of U.S. patent no. 6780877. Bausch & Lomb holds the exclusive rights to market Bepreve until at least 2014.

The patent US6780877 entitled ‘Acid addition salt of optically active piperidine compound and process for preparing the same’ was issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) on Aug 24, 2004 and expires[ii] by Dec 26, 2016. The ’877 patent is currently assigned[iii] to Mitsubishi Tanabe (source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database). The ’877 patent claims bepotastine besilate and a pharmaceutical composition including it.

The complaint alleges that Sandoz has infringed at least one claim of the ’877 patent by submitting ANDA No. 206080 to the FDA seeking approval for commercial marketing of Sandoz’s generic bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution before the expiration date of the ’877 patent. It further claimed that if approved and marketed, the generic would infringe at least one claim of the ’877 patent.

The suit sought a judgment of infringement, a court order postponing the effective date of the Sandoz ANDA until after the patent-in-suit expires, attorneys' fees and court costs.
See 3:14-cv-01325 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.

Max-Insight enables you to access all of our patent tools such as Patent Term Estimator, Patent Family Tree, Has This Patent Been Litigated, etc. in one location. Max-Insight is available in 4 different subscriptions: FreeBronzeSilver and Gold with varying usage levels. To learn more about Max-Insight, click here.




[i] Patent Marker provides an online environment where patentees can virtually mark products and search products for patent-related information.
[ii] Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents. 
[iii] MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Court Issues Judgment Favoring Insite Vision against Sandoz in Patent Dispute

Case Filed: May 26, 2011

Case Closed: Oct 04, 2013

Court: New Jersey District Court

Judge: Mary L. Cooper

Case Summary:

Insite Vision, Inspire and Pfizer jointly filed a patent infringement suit against Sandoz claiming that 5 of their patents were infringed. The cause of the suit was Sandoz’s filing of an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) with FDA seeking approval to market a generic version of the pharmaceutical product AzaSite® before the expiration of Plaintiffs' five patents covering AzaSite® and its use. The patents involved in suit were:
  •      US6159458 entitled ‘Sustained release ophthalmic compositions containing water soluble medicaments’ issued on Dec 12, 2000 and expiring* by Nov 04, 2017
  •         US6861411 entitled ‘Method of treating eye infections with azithromycin’ issued on Mar 01, 2005 and expiring* by Nov 25, 2018
  •         US6239113, US6569443 and US7056893 entitled ‘Topical treatment or prevention of ocular infections’, issued on May 29, 2001, May 27, 2003, Jun 06, 2006 and expiring* by Mar 31, 2019

The ‘458 and ‘893 patents are currently assigned+ to Insite Vision and ‘113 and ‘443 patents are currently assigned+ to Bausch & Lomb (source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database). As per complaint the ‘411 patent is assigned to Pfizer.  

The Court document says, InSite received notice on April 18, 2011 regarding the ANDA filing from Sandoz and stated it has 45 days to file a patent infringement lawsuit and the suit was filed within the timeframe.

Inspire currently holds± an approved New Drug Application (NDA) no. 50-810 for azithromycin ophthalmic solution 1% sterile topical ophthalmic drops, which are sold by Inspire under the trade name AzaSite® (source: Patent Marker). AzaSite is an antibiotic eye-drop medication used to treat an infection of the eye called bacterial conjunctivitis. Plaintiffs wanted judgment that Sandoz has infringed the patents and an injunction barring Sandoz’s products until expiration of the patents, along with fees, costs and expenses.

The Court rendered its final verdict ordering a judgment in favor of plaintiffs against defendant w.r.t
  •         claims 3 and 5 of ‘411 patent
  •         claims 6, 7, 8 and 9 of ‘113 patent
  •         claims 16 and 44 of ‘443 patent
  •         claims 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 30, 36 and 40 of ‘893 patent
  •         all counterclaims be dismissed with prejudice
  •        enjoinment from commercial manufacture of generic version until the expiration date of the patents.


See 3:11-cv-03080 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.

Has this patent been litigated? Use our free tool or download our free Android/iOS app on Google Play/ App Store.



* Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents.
+ MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded. 
± Patent Marker provides an online environment where patentees can virtually mark products and search products for patent-related information.

Friday, September 13, 2013

MSD, Sandoz Settle Suit over Zetia Generic

Case Filed: Sep 27, 2012

Case Closed: Sep 09, 2013

Court: New Jersey District Court

Judge: Jose L. Linares

Case Summary:
A patent infringement suit was filed by MSD against Sandoz as a result of the latter filing an abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) with FDA concerning their intent to market a generic version of Zetia, used to treat high cholesterol. The patents involved in suit are:
  •         RE37721 entitled Hydroxy-substituted azetidinone compounds useful as hypocholesterolemic agents issued on May 28, 2002 and expires* by Sep 21, 2013
  •         US5846966 entitled Combinations of hydroxy-substituted azetidinone compounds and HMG CoA Reductase Inhibitors issued on Dec 08, 1998 and expires* by Sep 21, 2013
  •         US7612058 entitled Methods for inhibiting sterol absorption issued on Nov 03, 2009 and expires* by Sep 21, 2013
  •         RE42461 entitled Hydroxy-substituted azetidinone compounds useful as hypocholesterolemic agents issued on Jun 14, 2011and expires* by Jun 14, 2028
  •         US7030106 entitled Sterol absorption inhibitor compositions issued on Apr 18, 2006 and expires* by Jan 25, 2022

The patents are currently assigned+ to MSD (source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database). MSD alleged that Sandoz’s abbreviated new drug application no. 203-931 to manufacture a generic version of Zetia, filed with FDA had the infringed the above mentioned patents, all of which cover the composition of the drug.

MSD currently holds± the new drug application (NDA) no. 21-445 (source: MaxVal’s Patent Marker), approved by FDA for 10 mg ezetimibe tablets on October 25, 2002, which is sold under the trade name Zetia. It is used to treat high cholesterol, along with a low-fat, low-cholesterol diet. It is sometimes given with other cholesterol-lowering medications. It is also used to treat high blood sitosterol and campesterol along with diet therapy. Plaintiffs wanted judgment that defendant has infringed the patents and an injunction barring their products until expiration of the patents, along with costs and expenses.

The Court rendered its final verdict pursuant to the parties agreeing upon a consent judgment. The Judge ordered:
  •        Claims, counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice
  •        Defendant is enjoined from manufacturing/ marketing a generic version of Zetia until April 25, 2017
  •        Parties to bear their own costs and expense

See 2:12-cv-06077 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts

Are you looking for a tool to calculate patent terms? Try Patent Term Estimator, our free tool or download our free Android app on Google Play Store.
   


* Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents. 
+ MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.
± Patent Marker provides an online environment where patentees can virtually mark products and search products for patent-related information.

Monday, August 26, 2013

Avanir, Sandoz Settle Nuedexta Patent Litigation

Case Filed: May 30, 2013

Case Closed: Aug 20, 2013

Court: Delaware District Court

Judge: Leonard P. Stark

Case Summary:
Avanir Pharmaceuticals filed a patent infringement suit against Sandoz concerning its filing of abbreviated new drug application with the FDA with its intent to commercialize a generic version of Nuedexta®, which is used to treat pseudobulbar affect. The patents-in-suit were:
  •       RE38115 entitled ‘Dextromethorphan and an oxidase inhibitor for treating intractable conditions’ issued on May 06, 2003 and expiring* by Sep 22, 2014
  •     US8227484 entitled ‘Pharmaceutical compositions comprising dextromethorphan and quinidine for the treatment of neurological disorders’ issued on Jul 24, 2012 and expiring* by Jul 17, 2023
  •   US7656282 entitled ‘Batteryless tire inflation pressure detecting apparatus with improved power-saving configuration’ issued on Feb 02, 2010 and expiring* by May 15, 2026
According to the complaint, Avanir is the assignee of the patents-in-suit. Plaintiffs alleged that Sandoz’s abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) no. 203538 to manufacture generic Nuedexta capsules, filed with the FDA had infringed the ‘115, ‘484 and ‘282 patents all of which cover the composition of the drug. Avanir currently holds+ the approved New Drug Application (NDA) no. 21-879 (source: MaxVal’s Patent Marker), approved by FDA on October 2010 for dextromethorphan hydrobromide/quinidinesulfate capsules, which it sells sunder the trade name Nuedexta®.  It is used to treat involuntary outbursts of crying or laughing in people with certain neurological disorders, including multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Avanir wanted judgment that Sandoz has infringed the patents and an injunction barring Sandoz’s products until expiration of the patents, along with costs and expenses.

The parties having agreed upon a settlement subsequently filed a stipulation of dismissal, pursuant to which the Court ordered all claims, defenses, and counterclaims dismissed without prejudice, thereby concluding this litigation with respect to Sandoz. The settlement agreement grants Sandoz the right to begin selling a generic version of Nuedexta on July 30, 2026, or earlier under certain circumstances. The settlement does not end Avanir's ongoing litigation against the other four ANDA filers (Par Pharmaceutical, Wockhardt, Impax Laboratories and Watson).

See 1:13-cv-00961 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.

Are you looking for a tool to calculate patent terms? Try Patent Term Estimator, our free tool or download our free Android app on Google Play Store.



* Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents
+ Patent Marker provides an online environment where patentees can virtually mark products and search products for patent-related information.

Tuesday, July 9, 2013

Court Dismisses Case against Navinta, Sandoz over Naropin Generic



Case Filed: Jul 22, 2010

Case Closed: Jul 01, 2013

Court: New Jersey District Court 

Judge: Joel A. Pisano

Case Summary:
A patent infringement suit was filed by APP Pharmaceuticals against Navinta,  Hospira, Sandoz, Sagent Pharmaceuticals and Strides as a result of their filing an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) with the FDA concerning their intent to market generic versions of APP’s ropivacaine hydrochloride injection product, Naropin®, a pain management drug.
The patents involved in this suit were:

US5670524 entitled Methods and compositions for the treatment of pain utilizing ropivacaine issued on Sep 23, 1997 and expiring* by Sep 23, 2014
US5834489 entitled Methods and compositions for the treatment of pain utilizing ropivacaine issued on Nov 10, 1998 and expired* Jun 28, 2013

The patents-in-suit generally relate to Naropin and its uses, as said in complaint. APP alleged that one ANDA was filed by Navinta in collaboration with Sandoz, a second one by Hospira and another by Sagent and Strides. The patents in suit were last assigned+ to APP (source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database). 

APP is the current holder of New Drug Application (NDA) 20-553 for Naropin, which was approved by FDA in Sep 1999. Naropin helps to numb the injected area so that less pain is felt.

In 2010, Sagent, Strides and Hospira were dismissed from the case.  Recently on July 01, the Court ordered all claims and counterclaims against APP, Navinta and Sandoz to be dismissed with prejudice, thereby closing the case. All attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses are to be borne by the respective parties.

See case 3:10-cv-03708 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.

Are you looking for a tool to calculate patent terms? Try Patent Term Estimator, our free tool or download our free Android app on Google Play Store.




* Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents

+ MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.