Showing posts with label Pfizer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pfizer. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 4, 2014

Pfizer Wins Patent Fight against Novel to Block Generic Lyrica

Case Filed: Jan 07, 2011

Case Closed: May 28, 2014

Court: Delaware District Court

Judge: Gregory M. Sleet

Case Summary:
Pfizer filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Novel Laboratories for filing abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) with FDA seeking approval to market a generic version of Pfizer’s pharmaceutical product Lyrica, prior to expiry of U.S. patents covering the drug and its use.

Patents-in-Suit:
The patents involved in this suit are:
  •        US6197819 entitled ‘Gamma amino butyric acid analogs and optical isomers,’ issued on Mar 06, 2001 and expires* by Mar 06, 2018
  •    US5563175 entitled ‘GABA and L-glutamic acid analogs for antiseizure treatment,’ issued on Oct 10, 1996 and expired* on Oct 03, 2013
  •      RE41920 entitled ‘Isobutylgaba and its derivatives for the treatment of pain,’ issued on Nov 09, 2010 and expires* by Jul 16, 2017

The ‘819 and ‘920 patents are currently+ assigned to Northwestern University and Warner-Lambert (source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database.)

The patents relate to compounds that are analogs of glutamic acid and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). The analogs are useful as antiseizure therapy for central nervous system disorders such as epilepsy, Huntington's chorea, cerebral ischemia, Parkinson's disease, tardive dyskinesia and spasticity.

As in Complaint:
Pfizer and Northwestern received a notice letter stating that Novel had submitted ANDA no. 202269 and the patents-in-suit are invalid, unenforceable, or will not be infringed by the commercial manufacture of the Novel’s ANDA product.

Novel’s Counterclaim:
Novel asserted counterclaims, including declaratory judgment of non-infringement and invalidity of the '819, '175 and '920 patents and for a declaration of unenforceability of the '819 and '920 patents’ term extensions.

Lyrica NDA:
Pfizer currently± holds approved new drug application (NDA) no. 22-488  approved by FDA for a pregabalin oral solution containing 20mg/mL of pregabalin (source: Patent Marker). The patents-in-suit are listed in the FDA publication “Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations,” with respect to Lyrica.

District Court Proceedings:
On July 2012, the court concluded that the asserted claims of the '819, '175 and '920 patents are not invalid and the '819 and '920 patents’ term extensions are not invalid and defendants' proposed products infringe claims 1 and 4 of the '819 patent. Accordingly judgment was entered in favor of Pfizer. The judgment was appealed (2012-1576) and the federal court affirmed that claim 2 of the '819 patent is infringed and not invalid and affirmed the judgment of the district court. In Mar 2013, district court entered a stipulated order staying the action pending final disposition of appeal.

The stay is now removed and Novel is enjoined from commercially manufacturing of their proposed ANDA product, prior to Dec 30, 20I8. The claims and counterclaims are dismissed with no costs imposed on parties.

See 1:11-cv-00027 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.

Max-Insight enables you to access all of our patent tools such as Patent Term Estimator, Patent Family Tree, Has This Patent Been Litigated, etc. in one location. Max-Insight is available in 4 different subscriptions: FreeBronzeSilver and Gold with varying usage levels. To learn more about Max-Insight, click here.





* Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents. 
+ MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.
± Patent Marker provides an online environment where patentees can virtually mark products and search products for patent-related information.

Sunday, June 1, 2014

Pfizer, Torrent End Patent Dispute

Case Filed: Mar 17, 2014

Case Closed: May 27, 2014

Court: New Jersey District Court

Judge: Joel A. Pisano

Case Summary:
New York-based Pfizer Inc. filed a patent infringement lawsuit against India-based pharmaceuticals company Torrent to block sales of a generic version of erectile-dysfunction drug Viagra. The lawsuit concerned the filing of ANDA by Torrent, seeking approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for generic Viagra, also known as sildenafil citrate.

Patent-in-suit:
The patent at issue was: US6469012 entitled ‘Pyrazolopyrimidinones for the treatment of impotence,’ issued on Oct 22, 2002 and expired[i] on Jun 09, 2013. Pfizer was the last assignee[ii] of the patent (source: MaxVal’ Assignment Database.) The patent at suit covers methods of treating erectile dysfunction by administering sildenafil.

As in Complaint:
Torrent notified Pfizer that it had filed abbreviated new drug application ANDA No. 091448 with the FDA, seeking approval to market and sell, prior to the expiration of the ’012 patent, 25 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg tablets of sildenafil citrate, generic copies of Viagra®.  It further alleged that the ’012 patent is not valid, unenforceable, or will not be infringed.

The complaint sought an order permanently barring Ahmedabad, India-based Torrent, its officers, agents and employees from “making, using, selling, selling, marketing, distributing or importing” the allegedly infringing drug. Only the claims 25 and 26 were asserted in the case.

NDA Holder:
Pfizer currently holds[iii] the approved new drug application (NDA) for treating erectile dysfunction with sildenafil citrate, which Pfizer sells under the registered name Viagra® (source: MaxVal’s Patent Marker). Treatment of erectile dysfunction with Viagra® is covered by the ’012 patent.

The drug was approved by the FDA on Mar 27, 1998 and offered for sale in US later that year. In 2008, annual sales of Viagra peaked at $1,934 million. In 2013, Viagra delivered over $1 billion in revenue, which met only half the revenue made in 2012. The drug lost its exclusivity in most major EU markets in 2013 while in the US it will expire in 2019.

Pfizer’s Voluntary Dismissal:
Pfizer filed a notice of voluntary dismissal, accordingly the court granted and ordered the case be dismissed without prejudice with no costs imposed on the parties.
Others Cases by Pfizer:
Pfizer has filed nearly a dozen cases asserting the same patent covering the drug against Bayer, Actavis, Teva, Hetero Drugs, etc.

See 3:14-cv-01704 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.

Max-Insight enables you to access all of our patent tools such as Patent Term Estimator, Patent Family Tree, Has This Patent Been Litigated, etc. in one location. Max-Insight is available in 4 different subscriptions: FreeBronzeSilver and Gold with varying usage levels. To learn more about Max-Insight, click here.



[i] Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents.
[ii] MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.
[iii] Patent Marker provides an online environment where patentees can virtually mark products and search products for patent-related information.

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Court Issues Judgment Favoring Insite Vision against Sandoz in Patent Dispute

Case Filed: May 26, 2011

Case Closed: Oct 04, 2013

Court: New Jersey District Court

Judge: Mary L. Cooper

Case Summary:

Insite Vision, Inspire and Pfizer jointly filed a patent infringement suit against Sandoz claiming that 5 of their patents were infringed. The cause of the suit was Sandoz’s filing of an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) with FDA seeking approval to market a generic version of the pharmaceutical product AzaSite® before the expiration of Plaintiffs' five patents covering AzaSite® and its use. The patents involved in suit were:
  •      US6159458 entitled ‘Sustained release ophthalmic compositions containing water soluble medicaments’ issued on Dec 12, 2000 and expiring* by Nov 04, 2017
  •         US6861411 entitled ‘Method of treating eye infections with azithromycin’ issued on Mar 01, 2005 and expiring* by Nov 25, 2018
  •         US6239113, US6569443 and US7056893 entitled ‘Topical treatment or prevention of ocular infections’, issued on May 29, 2001, May 27, 2003, Jun 06, 2006 and expiring* by Mar 31, 2019

The ‘458 and ‘893 patents are currently assigned+ to Insite Vision and ‘113 and ‘443 patents are currently assigned+ to Bausch & Lomb (source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database). As per complaint the ‘411 patent is assigned to Pfizer.  

The Court document says, InSite received notice on April 18, 2011 regarding the ANDA filing from Sandoz and stated it has 45 days to file a patent infringement lawsuit and the suit was filed within the timeframe.

Inspire currently holds± an approved New Drug Application (NDA) no. 50-810 for azithromycin ophthalmic solution 1% sterile topical ophthalmic drops, which are sold by Inspire under the trade name AzaSite® (source: Patent Marker). AzaSite is an antibiotic eye-drop medication used to treat an infection of the eye called bacterial conjunctivitis. Plaintiffs wanted judgment that Sandoz has infringed the patents and an injunction barring Sandoz’s products until expiration of the patents, along with fees, costs and expenses.

The Court rendered its final verdict ordering a judgment in favor of plaintiffs against defendant w.r.t
  •         claims 3 and 5 of ‘411 patent
  •         claims 6, 7, 8 and 9 of ‘113 patent
  •         claims 16 and 44 of ‘443 patent
  •         claims 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 30, 36 and 40 of ‘893 patent
  •         all counterclaims be dismissed with prejudice
  •        enjoinment from commercial manufacture of generic version until the expiration date of the patents.


See 3:11-cv-03080 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.

Has this patent been litigated? Use our free tool or download our free Android/iOS app on Google Play/ App Store.



* Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents.
+ MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded. 
± Patent Marker provides an online environment where patentees can virtually mark products and search products for patent-related information.

Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Pfizer, Alkem Settle Suit over Toviaz



Case Filed: Jun 24, 2013

Case Closed: Aug 08, 2013

Court: Illinois Northern District Court

Judge: Joan B. Gottschall

Case Summary:
A patent infringement case was filed by Pfizer and UCB Pharma GmbH against Alkem as a result of their filing an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) with the FDA concerning their intent to market a generic version of Toviaz®, which is used to treat overactive bladder. The patents-in-suit were:
  • US6858650: “Stable salts of novel derivatives of 3,3-diphenylpropylamines, issued on Feb 22, 2005 and expiring* by Nov 16, 2019
  • US7384980: Derivatives of 3,3-diphenylpropylamines issued on Jun 10, 2008 and expiring* by May 12, 2018
  • US7855230: Derivatives of 3,3-diphenylpropylamines issued on Dec 21, 2010 and expiring* by May 12, 2018
  • US7985772: Derivatives of 3,3-diphenylpropylamines issued on Jul 26, 2011 and expiring* by May 12, 2018
  • US8338478: Derivatives of 3,3-diphenylpropylamine issued on Dec 25, 2012 and expiring* by May 12, 2018
The ‘650, ‘980 and ‘230 patents are currently assigned+ to UCB Pharma GmbH (source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database) and ‘772 and ‘478 patents are assigned to UCB Pharma GmbH as per face page. According to the complaint, Pfizer is the exclusive licensee of the patents. 

Pfizer is the current holder± of the New Drug Application (NDA) no. 022030 for Pfizer’s Toviaz, (source: Patent Marker) for fesoterodine fumarate extended-release tablets, in 4 and 8 mg dosage strengths, that is approved by FDA on Oct 31, 2008.  Plaintiffs alleged that defendant with the Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) No. 20-4827 sought FDA approval to market a generic version of Pfizer’s pharmaceutical product, Toviaz (and/or its use) that is protected by five valid patents that are enforceable.  Pfizer and UCB wanted judgment that Alkem has infringed the patents and an injunction barring Alkem’s products, along with costs, expenses and other reliefs.

It appears that the parties were directed to discuss settlement of the case. Later, plaintiffs filed a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to which the Court ordered civil action to be dismissed without prejudice, thereby closing the case.

See case 1:13-cv-04628 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.

Are you looking for a tool to calculate patent terms? Try Patent Term Estimator, our free tool or download our free Android app on Google Play Store.


* Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents.
+ MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.
± Patent Marker provides an online environment where patentees can virtually mark products and search products for patent-related information.

Wednesday, June 19, 2013

Teva, Sun Settle Suit over Pantoprazole Patent



Case Filed: Sep 13, 2007

Case Closed: Jul 16, 2013

Judge: Jose L. Linares

Court: New Jersey District Court

Case Summary:
A patent infringement suit was filed by Atlanta Pharma and Wyeth against Teva and Sun as a result of filing an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) no. 77-056 and 77-058 (respectively) with the FDA concerning its intent to market 20 mg and 40 mg generic Protonix® (pantoprazole sodium) tablets. 

The patent involved in this suit was US4758579, entitled Fluoroalkoxy substituted benzimidazoles useful as gastric acid secretion inhibitors issued on Jul 19, 1988 and expired[*] on Jul 19, 2005. The patent was last assigned[†] to Nycomed (subsidiary of Pfizer) (source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database). As per the complaint, Atlanta owns the patent and Wyeth (owned by Pfizer) is the exclusive licensee of the ‘579 patent.

Wyeth/Pfizer is the current holder of the NDA no. 20-987 for which the FDA granted approval for 20 and 40 mg delayed-release tablets with active ingredient pantoprazole sodium that are sold under the trade name Protonix. It is used to treat erosive esophagitis (damage to the esophagus from stomach acid), and other conditions involving excess stomach acid such as Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.

The case is concluded as Teva, Sun, Wyeth/Pfizer and Altana/Nycomed (subsidiary of Pfizer) announced that they have entered into a settlement agreement to resolve the patent dispute. As part of the settlement, Teva and Sun agreed to pay $2.15 billion to Wyeth/Pfizer and a partner to settle the litigation over unauthorized sales of the heartburn drug with pantoprazole sodium as active ingredient. Pursuant to the settlement, Court ordered all claims and counterclaims be dismissed with prejudice. 

See 2:04-cv-02355 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.

Patent Term Estimator, use our free tool or download our free Android app on Google Play Store.




[*] Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents.
[†] MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.