Showing posts with label Teva. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Teva. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 13, 2014

Lupin, Teva and Others Win Judgment over Anti-Inflammatory Drug

Case Filed: May 05, 2013

Case Closed: May 08, 2014

Court: Virginia Eastern District Court

Judge: Arenda L. Wright Allen

Case Summary:

G.D. Searle and Pfizer jointly filed a suit alleging patent infringement of U.S RES44048 by defendants Lupin, Teva, Mylan, Watson and Apotex. The lawsuit concerned filing of abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) with the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) seeking approvals to market generic versions of Pfizer's Celebrex® drug product to treat rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis, prior to expiration of the '048 patent and related period of exclusivity.

Patent-in-suit:

The patent involved in this suit is: RE44048 entitled ‘4-[5-(4-methylphenyl)-3-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-1-YL]benzenesulfonamide for the treatment of inflammation or an inflammation-associated disorder,’ duly issued to G.D. Searle on May 05, 2013 and expired[i] on Nov 30, 2013. The patent describes a class of pyrazolyl benzenesulfonamide compounds, compositions and methods for treating inflammation and inflammation-associated disorders.

As in complaint:

Pfizer filed this suit on the day the patent office issued the '048 patent and has a pediatric exclusivity that expires by Dec 02, 2015. Defendants intend to market generic versions of Pfizer's Celebrex® drug product beginning on or about May 30, 2014, which is prior to the expiration of the '048 patent. One or more claims of the '048 patent cover use of the pyrazolyl benzenesulfonamide compounds disclosed to treat each of the indications in Pfizer's Celebrex® label.

Defendants’ notice letters referring to the ANDAs (nos. 202240, 76-898, 78-857, 200562 and 204197) stated the claims 1-17 of the patent-in-suit as invalid, unenforceable and/or will not be infringed by the commercial manufacture of their ANDA products.

The complaint stated that the act of infringement will cause plaintiffs to suffer irreparable harm (even in case of later judicial determination) and sought preliminary injunction to prevent irreparable and irreversible harm.

ANDA holder:

G.D. Searle currently holds[ii] an approved new drug application, no. 20-998, for celecoxib capsules, 50, 100, 200and 400mg dosage strengths, which it sells under the registered name Celebrex® (source: Patent Marker). As stated in Pfizer's FDA approved label for Celebrex®, the drug is indicated for the treatment of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, acute pain and primary dysmenorrhea.

Final Judgment:

The Court found that the '048 patent is invalid for obviousness-type double patenting. Accordingly, the Court granted in part the Joint Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendants and denied plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment. In line with court’s opinion and order, final judgment was entered in favor of defendants.

Appeal:

The case has now been appealed by G.D. Searle and Pfizer on May 09 challenging court’s decision favoring Lupin, Teva, Mylan, Watson and Apotex.

See 2:13-cv-00121 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.

Max-Insight enables you to access all of our patent tools such as Patent Term Estimator, Patent Family Tree, Has This Patent Been Litigated, etc. in one location. Max-Insight is available in 4 different subscriptions: Free, Bronze, Silver and Gold with varying usage levels. To learn more about Max-Insight, click here.





[i] Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents.
[ii] Patent Marker provides an online environment where patentees can virtually mark products and search products for patent-related information.

Thursday, May 8, 2014

Warner Chilcott Challenges Lower Court Decision over Actonel Patents

Case Filed: Apr 29, 2014

Origin Case: 1:08-cv-00627

Case Summary:

Hoffmann-La Roche, Proctor & Gamble (P&G) and Warner Chilcott Company filed a patent infringement complaint in Sep 2008 against Teva in response to its filing an amended ANDA to market a generic version of P&G’s drug product, Actonel.

The patents involved in the suit are:
  •  US7192938 entitled ’Method of treatment using bisphosphonic acid,’ issued on Mar 20, 2007 and expiring* by May 10, 2022    
  •  US5583122 entitled ‘Pharmaceutical compositions containing geminal diphosphonates,’ issued on Dec 12, 1996 and expired* on Dec 10, 2013
  • US6165513 entitled ‘Film-coated tablet for improved upper gastrointestinal tract safety,’ issued on Dec 26, 2000 and expiring* by Jun 10, 2018
The ‘938 patent was originally issued to Hoffmann-La Roche and the ‘122 and ‘513 patents were originally issued to P&G.  Currently the patents are assigned+ to Warner Chilcott (source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database.)

Actonel is the commercial formulation of risedronate sodium developed and manufactured by P&G. The complaint stated that the drug product is covered by the claims of the patents-in-suit.  P&G is the current holder± of Actonel approved by FDA for 30, 5, 35, 75 and 150 mg (source: Patent Marker).

Actonel is used to prevent and treat certain types of bone loss (osteoporosis) in adults. This medication works by slowing bone loss to help maintain strong bones and reduces the risk of broken bones (fractures.)

According to the complaint, P&G received a notice letter from Teva regarding the amended ANDA filing for Actonel generics and will engage in manufacture after receiving approval from FDA. Teva also asserted that claims of the ‘938, ‘122 and ‘513 patents are invalid. Plaintiffs believed that the amended ANDA products have the same active ingredients, dosage forms and are bioequivalent to Actonel.

In each of the three counts of infringement brought against Teva, the complaint was common, stating Teva’s amended ANDA  (no. 79-215) submission intended to commercialize the generics that infringe the patents-in-suit, prior to expiration.

P&G requested   a court order enjoining Teva from manufacturing the accused product until after the expiration of the asserted patents and award them with reasonable costs.
A few other cases asserting the same patents were consolidated, and defendants included Apotex, Mylan and Sun. The case came to an end in Apr 2014 with judgment favoring defendants against plaintiffs. The Court considered the patents-in-suit invalid due to fact that prior art disclosed the efficacy and safety of high doses of risedronate, rendering the patents-in-suit obvious.

The judge granted a joint motion for summary judgment of invalidity filed by Teva, Apotex, Mylan and Sun, while denying the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment of infringement.

Warner Chilcott filed an appeal challenging the district court’s decision of considering the patents obvious.

See 2014-1439 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.
Max-Insight enables you to access all of our patent tools such as Patent Term Estimator, Patent Family Tree, Has This Patent Been Litigated, etc. in one location. Max-Insight is available in 4 different subscriptions: Free, Bronze, Silver and Gold with varying usage levels. To learn more about Max-Insight, click here.




* Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents. 
+ MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.
± Patent Marker provides an online environment where patentees can virtually mark products and search products for patent-related information.

Thursday, February 27, 2014

USCA Dismisses Teva, Alcon IP Suit over Vigamox

Case Filed: Dec 02, 2009

Case Closed: Feb 25, 2014

Origin Case: 1:06-cv-00234

Case Closed: Oct 20, 2009

Case Summary:
Bayer Healthcare and Alcon Pharmaceuticals filed a patent infringement suit against Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. in Delaware District Court on Apr 05, 2006, in response to Teva filing an abbreviated new drug application to block their planned generic version of Vigamox.

Plaintiffs claim that a Teva abbreviated new drug application infringes the patents covering Vigamox, an antibiotic used to treat bacterial infections of the eye. Teva notified Alcon in a letter that it planned to make its own version, according to the suit. "Alcon will suffer irreparable injury unless Teva is enjoined from infringing the patents," the complaint said.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted approval in 2003 to sell a solution that contains moxifloxacin hydrochloride, which is marketed in the U.S. as Vigamox, according to the complaint. Alcon is the current holder1 of the NDA for Vigamox (source: Patent Maker). The ANDA, which Teva filed, sought FDA approval to manufacture a drug (eye solution) with the same active ingredient before the patent expires, the suit says.

The suit sought a judgment of infringement, a court order postponing the effective date of the Teva ANDA until after the patents-in-suit expire, a permanent injunction, treble damages, attorneys' fees and court costs.

The patents-in-suit are:
  •         US5607942 entitled ‘7-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-3-quinolone- and - naphthyridone-carboxylic acid derivatives as antibacterial agents and feed additives’, issued on Mar 04, 1997 and expiring2  by Mar 04, 2014
  •         US4990517 entitled ‘7-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-3-quinolone- and - naphthyridone-carboxylic acid derivatives as antibacterial agents and feed additives’, issued on Feb 05, 1991 and expired2  on Jul 15, 2008
  •         US6716830 entitled ‘Ophthalmic antibiotic compositions containing moxifloxacin’, issued on Apr 06, 2004 and expiring2 by Sep 22, 2020

The patents are currently assigned3 to Bayer Healthcare and Alcon (source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database).
In Oct 2009, Judge Sue L. Robinson signed off judgment in favor of Alcon against Teva, ruling that Teva's proposed generic Vigamox infringed the patent US6716830. Due to the court order preventing Teva from obtaining FDA approval for its version until 2020, Teva filed an appeal notice to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on October 20, 2009. In Feb 2014, Teva and Alcon together filed a motion to terminate appeal through dismissal. Considering the joint motion filed, USCA granted the motion and ordered the appeal be dismissed.
See 2010-1097 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.
Max-Insight enables you to access all of our patent tools such as Patent Term Estimator, Patent Family Tree, Has This Patent Been Litigated, etc. in one location. Max-Insight is available in 4 different subscriptions: Free, Bronze, Silver and Gold with varying usage levels. To learn more about Max-Insight, click here.






1 Patent Marker provides an online environment where patentees can virtually mark products and search products for patent-related information.
2 Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents. 
3 MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.

Thursday, November 14, 2013

Patent Litigation Resolved between Otsuka and Teva

Case Filed: Mar 31, 2008      
        
Case Closed: Nov 07, 2013

Court: New Jersey District Court

Judge: Mary L. Cooper

Case Duration: 2047 Days

Case Summary:
Tokyo based pharmaceutical company Otsuka filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Teva USA and its parent company Teva Pharmaceuticals over the antipsychotic drug Abilify. The case was filed for Teva filing Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) no. 90-251 for oral solution containing 1 mg/mL of aripiprazole, seeking FDA approval to manufacture a generic version of the drug.

Otsuka currently holds[i] the new drug application (NDA) no. 02-1713 and 02-1436 for aripiprazole oral solution which was approved by FDA on Nov 15, 2002 and Dec 10, 2004 and is sold under the trade name Abilify (source: Patent Marker). It is used to treat the symptoms of psychotic conditions such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder and also used to treat irritability and symptoms of aggression.

The complaint stated that Teva has infringed the patents by submitting ANDA No. 90-251 before the expiration date of the patents-in-suit covering the medication. The patent US5006528 entitled ‘Carbostyril derivatives’ issued on Apr 09, 1991 and expiring by Oct 20, 2014 is one among the patents-in-suit. The other is the US6977257 patent entitled ‘aripiprazole oral solution’, which was issued on Dec 20, 2005 and expiring[ii] by Apr 24, 2022. Both the patents are assigned[iii] to Otsuka (source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database).

Otsuka asked the court to enter judgment that Teva has infringed the ‘528 and ‘257 patents by submitting the NDA at issue, an injunction barring Teva from making, importing or selling the proposed generic products until after the ‘528 patent’s expiration, and award Otsuka its attorneys’ fees and costs.

It appears that the parties have settled the case and agreed stipulation was filed, pursuant to which the Court granted dismissal without prejudice and the parties will incur their own costs and expenses. 

See 3:08-cv-01583 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.
* Expected expiration date using Patent Term Estimator, use our free tool or download our free Android app on Google Play Store.





[i] Patent Marker provides an online environment where patentees can virtually mark products and search products for patent-related information.
[ii] Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents
[iii] MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.

Tuesday, July 23, 2013

Cephalon, Impax Settle Suit over Fentora Generic



On Nov 2011, a suit was filed by Cephalon (which was later acquired by Teva) and CIMA Labs against Impax, alleging infringement of four patents for the drug Fentora, used to treat pain associated with cancer. The patents in suit were:

Patent Number
Current Assignee[i]
Issued Date
Expiration Date[ii]
Title
US6200604
Cephalon
Mar 13, 2001
Mar 26, 2019
Sublingual buccal effervescent
US6974590
Cephalon
Dec 13, 2005
Mar 26, 2019
Sublingual buccal effervescent
US7862832
Cephalon
Jan 04, 2011
Dec 30, 2024
Generally linear effervescent oral fentanyl dosage form and methods of administering
US7862833
Cephalon
Jan 04, 2011
Dec 30, 2024
Effervescent oral opiate dosage forms and methods of administering opiates
Source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database. 

According to the complaint, Impax filed an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) no. 203357 with the FDA to market a generic version of Fentora (fentanyl buccal tablets) containing 100, 200, 400, 600, and 800 meg of fentanyl citrate in violation of the above patent protections. Cephalon is the current holder[iii] of approvals for the drug Fentora (source: Patent Marker) with New Drug Application (NDA) no.  021947 approved by FDA on Sep 25, 2006. The complaint sought judgment of infringement, damages and permanent injunction to stop Impax’s generic sales.

The parties have announced to Court that they have settled the case and reached an agreement that is effective from Jun 21, 2013. As part of the agreement, the parties agreed to dismiss the case. Upon consideration the Court rendered its final verdict, ordering: 

  • Dismissal with prejudice
  • Parties to bear their own costs and expenses
  • Patents-in-suit are valid and enforceable
  • Impax is enjoined from manufacturing/ marketing generic version of Fentora until specified in the agreement

Case Details:

Court: Delaware District Court

Case Filed: Nov 18, 2011

Case Closed: Jul 16, 2013

See case 1:11-cv-01152 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts. 

Are you looking for a tool to calculate patent terms? Try Patent Term Estimator, our free tool or download our free Android app on Google Play Store.  



[i] Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents
[ii] MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.
[iii] Patent Marker provides an online environment where patentees can virtually mark products and search products for patent-related information.

Wednesday, June 19, 2013

Teva, Sun Settle Suit over Pantoprazole Patent



Case Filed: Sep 13, 2007

Case Closed: Jul 16, 2013

Judge: Jose L. Linares

Court: New Jersey District Court

Case Summary:
A patent infringement suit was filed by Atlanta Pharma and Wyeth against Teva and Sun as a result of filing an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) no. 77-056 and 77-058 (respectively) with the FDA concerning its intent to market 20 mg and 40 mg generic Protonix® (pantoprazole sodium) tablets. 

The patent involved in this suit was US4758579, entitled Fluoroalkoxy substituted benzimidazoles useful as gastric acid secretion inhibitors issued on Jul 19, 1988 and expired[*] on Jul 19, 2005. The patent was last assigned[†] to Nycomed (subsidiary of Pfizer) (source: MaxVal’s Assignment Database). As per the complaint, Atlanta owns the patent and Wyeth (owned by Pfizer) is the exclusive licensee of the ‘579 patent.

Wyeth/Pfizer is the current holder of the NDA no. 20-987 for which the FDA granted approval for 20 and 40 mg delayed-release tablets with active ingredient pantoprazole sodium that are sold under the trade name Protonix. It is used to treat erosive esophagitis (damage to the esophagus from stomach acid), and other conditions involving excess stomach acid such as Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.

The case is concluded as Teva, Sun, Wyeth/Pfizer and Altana/Nycomed (subsidiary of Pfizer) announced that they have entered into a settlement agreement to resolve the patent dispute. As part of the settlement, Teva and Sun agreed to pay $2.15 billion to Wyeth/Pfizer and a partner to settle the litigation over unauthorized sales of the heartburn drug with pantoprazole sodium as active ingredient. Pursuant to the settlement, Court ordered all claims and counterclaims be dismissed with prejudice. 

See 2:04-cv-02355 for more details. To get alerts on cases filed/closed, subscribe to our Litigation Alerts.

Patent Term Estimator, use our free tool or download our free Android app on Google Play Store.




[*] Expected expiration date. Patent Term Estimator is a free web-based tool that automatically calculates patent terms and expiration dates for U.S. utility patents.
[†] MaxVal offers Patent Assignment Alert service where subscribers receive email alerts when assignments relating to target applications, patents or entities of interest are recorded.